Lady Burned By Mcdonald's Coffee Pictures - Watch: The Real Story Behind That McDonald’s Hot Coffee - She alleged that the lid came loose, and that the hot coffee that spilled on her hand gave her second degree burns.
This story has always taken on a . She spilled the coffee, was burned, and one year later, sued mcdonald's. Liebeck offered to settle the case for $20,000 to cover her medical expenses and lost income. Even the punitive damages award . The lawsuit was liebeck vs mcdonalds, 1994, where a woman rested her hot cup of coffee between her legs in the car, spilled it and burned herself, .
Mcdonalds had been warned repeatedly that customers were getting burned, and had elected to "throw up its hands" and do nothing.
This story has always taken on a . She alleged that the lid came loose, and that the hot coffee that spilled on her hand gave her second degree burns. Liebeck offered to settle the case for $20,000 to cover her medical expenses and lost income. Many people now believe that the woman who sued mcdonalds for hot coffee. The lawsuit was liebeck vs mcdonalds, 1994, where a woman rested her hot cup of coffee between her legs in the car, spilled it and burned herself, . She spilled the coffee, was burned, and one year later, sued mcdonald's. Even the punitive damages award . This woman was scalded terribly . Mcdonalds coffee burn lawsuit pictures : Newspaper headlines such as "hot cup of coffee costs $2.9 million,"2or "coffee spill burns woman; Mcdonalds had been warned repeatedly that customers were getting burned, and had elected to "throw up its hands" and do nothing. Jury awards $2.9 million"3painted the picture of a . She was severely burned by mcdonald's coffee in february 1992.
This woman was scalded terribly . Jury awards $2.9 million"3painted the picture of a . This story has always taken on a . She alleged that the lid came loose, and that the hot coffee that spilled on her hand gave her second degree burns. She was severely burned by mcdonald's coffee in february 1992.
Mcdonalds had been warned repeatedly that customers were getting burned, and had elected to "throw up its hands" and do nothing.
She alleged that the lid came loose, and that the hot coffee that spilled on her hand gave her second degree burns. Liebeck offered to settle the case for $20,000 to cover her medical expenses and lost income. Newspaper headlines such as "hot cup of coffee costs $2.9 million,"2or "coffee spill burns woman; This story has always taken on a . Jury awards $2.9 million"3painted the picture of a . Mcdonalds had been warned repeatedly that customers were getting burned, and had elected to "throw up its hands" and do nothing. She sued mcdonald's, and a jury awarded her nearly $3 million in punitive damages for the burns she suffered. Many people now believe that the woman who sued mcdonalds for hot coffee. Even the punitive damages award . The lawsuit was liebeck vs mcdonalds, 1994, where a woman rested her hot cup of coffee between her legs in the car, spilled it and burned herself, . Mcdonalds coffee burn lawsuit pictures : This woman was scalded terribly . She spilled the coffee, was burned, and one year later, sued mcdonald's.
Even the punitive damages award . She alleged that the lid came loose, and that the hot coffee that spilled on her hand gave her second degree burns. She sued mcdonald's, and a jury awarded her nearly $3 million in punitive damages for the burns she suffered. Mcdonalds had been warned repeatedly that customers were getting burned, and had elected to "throw up its hands" and do nothing. She spilled the coffee, was burned, and one year later, sued mcdonald's.
Liebeck offered to settle the case for $20,000 to cover her medical expenses and lost income.
She alleged that the lid came loose, and that the hot coffee that spilled on her hand gave her second degree burns. Many people now believe that the woman who sued mcdonalds for hot coffee. This story has always taken on a . The lawsuit was liebeck vs mcdonalds, 1994, where a woman rested her hot cup of coffee between her legs in the car, spilled it and burned herself, . She sued mcdonald's, and a jury awarded her nearly $3 million in punitive damages for the burns she suffered. Jury awards $2.9 million"3painted the picture of a . She spilled the coffee, was burned, and one year later, sued mcdonald's. Even the punitive damages award . Mcdonalds had been warned repeatedly that customers were getting burned, and had elected to "throw up its hands" and do nothing. Liebeck offered to settle the case for $20,000 to cover her medical expenses and lost income. Newspaper headlines such as "hot cup of coffee costs $2.9 million,"2or "coffee spill burns woman; This woman was scalded terribly . She was severely burned by mcdonald's coffee in february 1992.
Lady Burned By Mcdonald's Coffee Pictures - Watch: The Real Story Behind That McDonald’s Hot Coffee - She alleged that the lid came loose, and that the hot coffee that spilled on her hand gave her second degree burns.. Jury awards $2.9 million"3painted the picture of a . She sued mcdonald's, and a jury awarded her nearly $3 million in punitive damages for the burns she suffered. Newspaper headlines such as "hot cup of coffee costs $2.9 million,"2or "coffee spill burns woman; Liebeck offered to settle the case for $20,000 to cover her medical expenses and lost income. She was severely burned by mcdonald's coffee in february 1992.
She sued mcdonald's, and a jury awarded her nearly $3 million in punitive damages for the burns she suffered lady burned by mcdonald's coffee. She sued mcdonald's, and a jury awarded her nearly $3 million in punitive damages for the burns she suffered.
Post a Comment for "Lady Burned By Mcdonald's Coffee Pictures - Watch: The Real Story Behind That McDonald’s Hot Coffee - She alleged that the lid came loose, and that the hot coffee that spilled on her hand gave her second degree burns."